However, within an effort to strike a balance between the rights of citizens plus the plans that are executed because of the authorities for that welfare, economic progress and prosperity from the country, the Court didn't generate a definitive ruling over the pending construction on the grid station, but, with the consent of both parties, ordered a review and report of grid project through the National Engineering Services of Pakistan (NESPAK) to propose alterations and location alternatives.

Delay in recording confessional statement is probably not treated fatal on the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

4.  It's been noticed by this Court that there is really a delay of one day inside the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness of your alleged incidence plus the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired to be the real brothers in the deceased but they didn't respond in any respect to your confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, 1 after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not seem much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation regarding why her arrest was not effected after making of your alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a great number of instances that extra judicial confession of an accused can be a weak sort of evidence which may be manoeuvred via the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is also depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding existence of some light in the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners with each other with a motorcycle at 4.

Deterrence: The concern of severe implications, including capital punishment, is meant to discourage possible criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is essential in reducing the prevalence of intentional killings.

lengthy period petitioner wasn't regarded as for promotion, meeting from the departmental promotion committee and consider the petitioner (Promotion)

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a effectively-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.

be established without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is actually a horrifying reality, a very small threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.

There are a great number of occasions where death was never supposed – even more where These nominated during the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of a human being is actually a tragic event. Nevertheless the death of any residing being isn't any much less a tragic event.

The regulation as established in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.

Please note, if you are seeking a rate exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly. 

 Criminal cases While in the common legislation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Contrary to most civil regulation systems, common law systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lessen courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition on the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Improvement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter for a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) from the Pakistan Constitution offers original jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to get up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.

one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found get more info guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.